Michael d'Arcy

Barrister

Call 2008

Michael’s practice encompasses a broad range of commercial litigation and arbitration, and with his scientific background, he is particularly well equipped to deal with issues of a technical, quantitative or complex nature.

With substantial experience, as sole Counsel or as part of a team, Michael regularly appears in High Court (including the Commercial Court, Administrative Court and Technology and Construction Court), the Court of Appeal, and before tribunals in international arbitration.

Areas of interest and expertise include (but are not limited to) banking and finance (including financial derivative transactions, mis-selling and structured finance), energy and technology-focused disputes, group litigation, joint ventures, shareholder disputes and regulatory matters. He also sits as an arbitrator.

Michael is recommended in Legal 500 as a leading junior in both the Commercial Litigation and Banking & Finance sectors, and in Chambers & Partners in the Banking & Finance sector.

Recent and current experience includes:

Acting for the Nissan Group in the major group action (circa 100,000 claimants) arising out of alleged breaches of emissions regulations. Nissan was a successful Defendant in the recent judgment of Cockerill LJ (July 2026).

Acting for the Danish Revenue (SKAT) in a $2 billion claim relating to fraudulent exploitation of tax reliefs.

Acted for the claimant in relation to a cryptocurrency investment that was allegedly procured by fraudulent misrepresentations.

Acting for the defendant in a dispute concerning the development of a battery storage facility.

Acted for the defendants in a $1 billion fraud claim brought by two Russian banks.

Acted for the defendant in a dispute over commission for investment advice provided by the claimant concerning a share acquisition in accordance with the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers.

Acted for Shell in a claim against Greenpeace arising from unauthorised boardings at sea of a Maltese-flagged vessel that was transporting a Shell rig from China to the North Sea, and related protests.

Acting for the defendant in a dispute concerning the sale and distribution networks of UK car supplies.

Acting in various disputes concerning the sale of interest rate hedging products governed by ISDA Master Agreements and related claims concerning LIBOR-manipulation.

Examples of Recent Cases
- Arbitration
  - ICC Arbitration
    With Paul Key QC in an ICC arbitration to determine claims for breach of a licensing agreement – this involved questions of English and foreign law.
  - LCIA Arbitration
    Acted (with Anthony de Garr Robinson QC, Steven Elliott, Ben Strong, Gerard Rothschild and Michael Watkins) in an LCIA arbitration for an investment fund in a £26 million claim against its former investment manager.
  - Acted (with Daniel Toledano QC) in an LCIA arbitration for an Indian pharmaceuticals company in a dispute concerning share issuance and alleged breach of contract in connection with a joint venture.
  - LCIA & ICC Arbitrations
    Assisted David Wolfson QC and Ben Strong in a number of LCIA and ICC arbitrations, acting for Indian firms which had entered into various derivatives transactions with several major banks. The dispute concerned the banks' right to terminate the transactions and demand payments thereunder.
- Banking and Financial Services
  - Fabric Ventures Group SÀRL v. Celsius Network Limited and Alexander Mashinsky
    Acted (as sole Counsel) for the claimant in relation to a cryptocurrency investment that was allegedly procured by fraudulent misrepresentations.
  - PJSC National Bank Trust v. Mints
    Acted (with Sebastian Isaac KC) for the defendants in a $1 billion fraud claim brought by two Russian banks concerning four sets of transactions which occurred in the context of the banks’ nationalisation in 2017. The claimants alleged that they had suffered losses in relation to the purchase of certain loans, repos and bonds. The case involved complicated issues of Russian law and quantification of loss.
  - Piper Sandler Limited v. Lamprell Limited
    Acted (as sole Counsel) for the defendant in a dispute over commission for investment advice provided by the claimant, with a claim totalling $1.5 million concerning a share acquisition in accordance with the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers, announced by the London Stock Exchange in July 2022.
  - BlueCrest Capital Management LLP et al. v. HMRC [2022] UKUT 200 (TCC); [2022] STC 1696 and [2022] UKUT 198 (TCC); [2022] STC 1586
    Currently acting (with Malcolm Gammie QC) for an asset management partnership and certain individual partners in a dispute with HMRC regarding the proper taxation of capital distributions by the partnership, and the proper taxation of profit distributions made by a Cayman Islands limited partnership. Tax at stake: in excess of £200 million.
  - CFH Clearing Limited v Merrill Lynch International Bank Limited [2019] EWHC 963 (Comm); [2020] EWCA Civ 1064
    Acted (with Stephen Auld QC) for an interbank “straight-through processing” venue in a claim against its prime-broker bank in respect of the pricing of 27 trades entered into in January 2015 in the wake of the de-pegging of the Swiss Franc from the Euro. Claim was for damages in the sum of CHF 2,479,000 (approx. £2 million); the dispute concerned the interplay between ISDA Master Agreements and the bank’s terms and conditions. The Defendant made a successful application for summary judgment, granted by Mrs Justice Moulder, upheld by the Court of Appeal.
  - Morris Group Limited v. Royal Bank of Scotland
    Acted (with Stephen Auld QC) for the Claimant property development company in a £30 million claim for losses resulting from alleged misrepresentations (including in relation to LIBOR) made by the Defendant in the sale of an interest rate hedging swap governed by an ISDA Master Agreement, and from the bank’s subsequent mistreatment of the Claimant through its Global Restructuring Group (GRG).
  - Ventra Investments Limited (In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) v. Bank of Scotland Plc
    Acted (with Stephen Davies QC) for the claimant property investment company (instructed by the liquidator, Andrew Hosking of Quantuma) in a claim for over £70 million losses resulting from fraudulent and negligent misrepresentations (including in relation to LIBOR) made by the Bank of Scotland in the sale to the company of interest rate hedging products governed by an ISDA Master Agreement.
  - Inter-City Properties (International) Limited & Ors v. Lloyds Bank Plc
    Acted (with Stephen Auld QC) for the claimant group of companies in claims worth approximately £30 million for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misstatement and breach of contract (arising from the pricing of interest rate hedging transactions governed by an ISDA Master Agreement, and also in relation to LIBOR).
  - Taberna Europe CDO II plc v. Selskabet (formerly Roskilde Bank A/S) (in bankruptcy) [2015] EWHC 871 (Comm)
    Acted (with Alain Choo-Choy QC) for the claimant investment fund in its successful misrepresentation claim against a bankrupt Danish Bank arising from the purchase in 2008 of €27 million of notes, which were subsequently found to be worthless.
  - MainFirst Austria GmbH (formerly Omicron Investment Management GmbH) v US Bank Trustees Ltd. and Carnuntum High Grade I Ltd.
    Acted (with Daniel Toledano QC) for Carnuntum in successfully contesting jurisdiction on the basis that the claimant’s proposed claim against Carnuntum had no real prospect of success. The dispute arose from the dismissal of the claimant as investment advisor for notes that had been issued by Carnuntum.
  - Deutsche Bank AG & ors v. Unitech Global Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. [2013] EWCA Civ 1372 & [2013] EWHC 2793 (Comm)
    Acted (with John Brisby QC) for the defendants in a $170 million loan claim by Deutsche Bank and other syndicate banks, and an associated $12 million swap claim by Deutsche Bank. Unitech’s application to amend its pleadings to incorporate the manipulation of LIBOR was refused by Cooke J on 28 February 2013 but the Court of Appeal unanimously allowed Unitech’s appeal on 8 November 2013.
  - Advised (with Lord Grabiner QC and Daniel Toledano QC) on the proper construction of certain provisions of the ISDA Master Agreement in the context of the distribution of funds from Lehman Brothers International (Europe).
- Commercial Litigation
  - Pan-NOx Litigation [2026] EWHC 1753 (KB)
    Acting (with Stephen Auld KC, Anneli Howard KC, Michael Ryan KC, Simon Gilson and Katherine Boucher) for the successful Nissan defendants in the substantial group litigation (alongside other lead defendants Mercedes, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen and Renault), worth multiple billions of pounds, brought by thousands of claimants alleging that prohibited defeat devices were installed in diesel vehicles that would reduce the effectiveness of the emissions control systems relating to nitrogen oxides (NOx). This high-profile litigation has been brought against a large number of manufacturers and involves a wealth of technical expert evidence, as well as issues of European law and quantification of loss. In her recent liability judgment (July 2026), Cockerill LJ held that the relevant Nissan vehicles did not contain prohibited defeat devices.
  - BlueCrest Capital Management LLP et al. v. HMRC [2022] UKUT 200 (TCC); [2022] STC 1696 and [2022] UKUT 198 (TCC); [2022] STC 1586
    Currently acting (with Malcolm Gammie QC) for an asset management partnership and certain individual partners in a dispute with HMRC regarding the proper taxation of capital distributions by the partnership, and the proper taxation of profit distributions made by a Cayman Islands limited partnership. Tax at stake: in excess of £200million.
  - Skatteforvaltningen (the Danish Customs And Tax Administration) v. Solo Capital Partners LLP (in Special Administration) and Ors [2025] EWHC 2364 (Comm); Skatteforvaltningen v MCML Ltd. [2025] EWCA Civ 371; [2025] 4 WLR 52
    Acted (with Charles Graham KC, James Goldsmith KC and others) for the Claimant, the Danish Revenue (“SKAT”), in relation to claims totalling approximately $2 billion arising from fraudulent claims for refunds of dividend withholding tax made against the Kingdom of Denmark. The first instance judgment of Baker J ([2025] EWHC 2364 (Comm)) is under appeal; SKAT’s appeal to the Court of Appeal in a separate but related part of the litigation, concerning issue estoppel and abuse of process ([2025] EWCA Civ 371), was ultimately successful in the Supreme Court ([2026] UKSC 19; [2026] 3 WLR 219).
  - Acted (with Steven Elliott QC) for a US aerospace company, in a dispute concerning the $500m acquisition of a European manufacturing facility (which ultimately proceeded at a much-reduced price).
  - Morris Group Limited v. Royal Bank of Scotland
    Acted (with Stephen Auld QC) for the Claimant property development company in a £30 million claim for losses resulting from alleged misrepresentations (including in relation to LIBOR) made by the Defendant in the sale of an interest rate hedging swap governed by an ISDA Master Agreement, and from the bank’s subsequent mistreatment of the Claimant through its Global Restructuring Group (GRG).
  - Parts Alliance Ltd v. Automobile Association Developments Ltd
    Acted (with Daniel Toledano KC) for the Defendant, the AA, in a dispute relating an agreement for the supply of automotive parts and related services.
  - Irish Nationwide Building Society v. The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
    Acted (with Malcolm Gammie QC) for the former Irish Nationwide Building Society (now part of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (in Special Liquidation)) in a claim for repayment of £30 million of corporation tax from HM Revenue and Customs.
  - Taberna Europe CDO II plc v. Selskabet (formerly Roskilde Bank A/S) (in bankruptcy) [2015] EWHC 871 (Comm)
    Acted (with Alain Choo-Choy QC) for the claimant investment fund in its successful misrepresentation claim against a bankrupt Danish Bank arising from the purchase in 2008 of €27 million of notes, which were subsequently found to be worthless.
  - MainFirst Austria GmbH (formerly Omicron Investment Management GmbH) v US Bank Trustees Ltd. and Carnuntum High Grade I Ltd. (judgment dated 14 March 2014)
    Acted (with Daniel Toledano QC) for Carnuntum in successfully contesting jurisdiction on the basis that the claimant’s proposed claim against Carnuntum had no real prospect of success. The dispute arose from the dismissal of the claimant as investment advisor for notes that had been issued by Carnuntum.
  - Deutsche Bank AG & ors v. Unitech Global Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. [2013] EWCA Civ 1372 & [2013] EWHC 2793 (Comm)
    Acted (with John Brisby QC) for the defendants in a $170 million loan claim by Deutsche Bank and other syndicate banks, and an associated $12 million swap claim by Deutsche Bank. Unitech’s application to amend its pleadings to incorporate the manipulation of LIBOR was refused by Cooke J on 28 February 2013 but the Court of Appeal unanimously allowed Unitech’s appeal on 8 November 2013.
  - Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v. Unitech Ltd. & Ors [2014] EWHC 1589 (Comm) & [2014] EWHC 3131 (Comm)
    Acted (with John Brisby QC) for Unitech Limited and related companies, which are contesting enforcement of LCIA arbitral awards totalling $348 million arising from shareholders’ agreements, in a series of applications by the judgment creditor for a worldwide freezing order ([2014] EWHC 1589 (Comm)) and subsequently appointment of receivers by way of equitable execution ([2014] EWHC 3131 (Comm)).
  - Nokia Corporation v. HTC Corporation
    Acted (with David Wolfson QC) for HTC in defending a claim for infringement of mobile communications patents and breach of licence. Issues included the construction of an English law licence and the effect of a French law agreement under the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
  - Patrick McKillen v. Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd. & Ors (Re Coroin) [2012] EWHC 2343 (Ch) & [2013] EWCA Civ 781
    Acted (with Stephen Auld QC and Michael Fealy QC) for the Second Respondent, an Irish investor, in an expedited combined Companies Court s.994 unfair prejudice petition and Chancery Division claim. This substantial shareholders’ dispute related to the ownership of Coroin Limited, the holding company of the Maybourne Group of hotels (The Connaught, Claridge’s and The Berkeley). The Respondents were successful at first instance, upheld by the Court of Appeal.
  - Acted (with Michael Fealy QC) for the claimant in an $8.2 million claim against an investment bank for negligent performance of an investment mandate. Claims related to breach of contract, breach of tortious duties and breach of statutory duties under the rules of the FSA Handbook.
  - Acted (with Jeffery Onions QC) for a transportation company in an insurance claim arising from damage in transit to an electricity generating turbine in the Dominican Republic.
  - Acted (with Craig Orr QC) for the claimant airline in a breach of contract dispute with a competitor.
- Company and Insolvency
  - Manolete Partners plc v. Christopher Webber
    Acted as sole Counsel in High Court proceedings in the Chancery Division for the Defendant in a £2.3 million claim concerning a director’s loan in the context of the relevant company’s liquidation.
  - Patrick McKillen v. Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd. & Ors (Re Coroin) [2012] EWHC 2343 (Ch); [2013] EWCA Civ 781
    Acted (with Stephen Auld QC and Michael Fealy QC) for the Second Respondent, an Irish investor, in an expedited combined Companies Court s.994 unfair prejudice petition and Chancery Division claim. This substantial shareholders’ dispute related to the ownership of Coroin Limited, the holding company of the Maybourne Group of hotels (The Connaught, Claridge’s and The Berkeley). The Respondents were successful at first instance, upheld by the Court of Appeal.
  - Acted for a construction company to obtain an urgent interim injunction, and subsequently a final injunction, restraining the presentation of a winding-up petition.
  - Advised (with Lord Grabiner QC and Daniel Toledano QC) on the proper construction of certain provisions of the ISDA Master Agreement in the context of the distribution of funds from Lehman Brothers International (Europe).
  - Acted for a construction company to obtain an urgent interim injunction, and subsequently a final injunction, restraining the presentation of a winding-up petition.
- Jurisdiction and Conflict of Laws
  - Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v. Unitech Ltd. & Ors [2014] EWHC 1589 (Comm) & [2014] EWHC 3131 (Comm)
    Acted (with John Brisby QC) for Unitech Limited and related companies, which are contesting enforcement of LCIA arbitral awards totalling $348 million arising from shareholders’ agreements, in a series of applications by the judgment creditor for a worldwide freezing order ([2014] EWHC 1589 (Comm)) and subsequently appointment of receivers by way of equitable execution ([2014] EWHC 3131 (Comm)).
  - MainFirst Austria GmbH (formerly Omicron Investment Management GmbH) v US Bank Trustees Ltd. and Carnuntum High Grade I Ltd.
    Acted (with Daniel Toledano QC) for Carnuntum in successfully contesting jurisdiction on the basis that the claimant’s proposed claim against Carnuntum had no real prospect of success. The dispute arose from the dismissal of the claimant as investment advisor for notes that had been issued by Carnuntum.
  - Deutsche Bank AG & ors v. Unitech Global Ltd. and Unitech Ltd. [2013] EWCA Civ 1372 & [2013] EWHC 2793 (Comm)
    Acted (with John Brisby QC) for the defendants in a $170 million loan claim by Deutsche Bank and other syndicate banks, and an associated $12 million swap claim by Deutsche Bank. Unitech’s application to amend its pleadings to incorporate the manipulation of LIBOR was refused by Cooke J on 28 February 2013 but the Court of Appeal unanimously allowed Unitech’s appeal on 8 November 2013.
  - LCIA & ICC Arbitrations
    Assisted David Wolfson QC and Ben Strong QC in a number of LCIA and ICC arbitrations, acting for Indian firms which had entered into various derivatives transactions with several major banks. The disputes concerned the banks’ right to terminate the transactions and demand payments thereunder.
- Energy and Natural Resources
  - Shell UK Limited and Fluor Limited v. Greenpeace UK Limited and others
    Acted (with Alex Gunning KC) for Shell in a claim against Greenpeace arising from unauthorised boardings at sea of a Maltese-flagged vessel that was transporting a Shell rig from China to the North Sea, and related protests, that took place in January and February 2023. This case was extremely high-profile, and involved issues relating to climate change, economic torts, human rights and both English and Maltese law.
  - Thurcroft Power Limited v. Volta Energy Group Limited [2022] EWHC 338 (Comm)
    Acted (as sole Counsel) for the successful defendant company, whose business is development of battery storage and small-scale generation plants for electricity balancing markets.
  - Acted (with Jeffery Onions QC) for an oil-gas major in relation to a dispute concerning the acquisition of North Sea gas pipelines and other infrastructure and assets, and the operation of related share options.
  - Advised the claimants on limitation issues concerning potential claims in relation to a consignment of tubing for water injection wells, off the coast of Ghana.
  - Advised (with Anna Boase QC) an oil-gas major on its rights and obligations under a share sale and purchase agreement relating to offshore oil and gas fields near Malaysia and Brunei Darussalam.
  - R (on the application of Infinis Plc) v. Gas and Electricity Markets Authority [2011] EWHC 1873 (Admin); [2013] EWCA Civ 70
    Acted (with Thomas Sharpe QC) for the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (Ofgem), at first instance and in the Court of Appeal, in a judicial review application by two electricity generation companies in connection with the issuance of Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs).
  - Advised in relation to potential breach of warranty and indemnity claims arising from an undersea cable installation contract.
  - Advised (with Laurence Rabinowitz QC) a major oil and gas multinational in relation to the interpretation of European Union legislation governing the use of coolants and of related contractual arrangements in respect of a gas terminal.
- Injunctions
  - Acted as sole Counsel for a power generation company in an application for an injunction to restrain presentation of a winding-up petition.
  - Acted for a construction company to obtain an urgent interim injunction, and subsequently a final injunction, in the High Court to restrain the presentation of a winding-up petition.
  - Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v. Unitech Ltd. & Ors [2014] EWHC 1589 (Comm) & [2014] EWHC 3131 (Comm)
    Acted (with John Brisby QC) for Unitech Limited and related companies, which are contesting enforcement of LCIA arbitral awards totalling $348 million arising from shareholders’ agreements, in a series of applications by the judgment creditor for a worldwide freezing order ([2014] EWHC 1589 (Comm)) and subsequently appointment of receivers by way of equitable execution ([2014] EWHC 3131 (Comm)).
What the Directories Say

“Michael is just wonderfully intelligent and fantastically clear in his advice.” "Michael is an excellent barrister. His advice is thorough and effective, and he is very client-friendly." (Chambers & Partners - Banking & Finance 2025)
"Responsive, bright, sensible and adaptable." (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2025)
"Michael is very cool under pressure. He demonstrates strong knowledge of the law and is clear and authoritative in his advice." "Michael is a real numbers advocate, so looking at quantum is his thing." (Chambers & Partners - Commercial Dispute Resolution 2025)
"Michael is very intelligent and able to deal with complex legal and factual issues with ease. His legal advice is clear and succinct and he has a good manner with clients." (Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2025)
"A technically excellent barrister, who is very pragmatic and has an excellent bedside manner." (Chambers & Partners - Commercial Dispute Resolution 2024)
"Hard-working, intelligent with a good balance of commercial and strategic awareness." (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2024)
"Michael is highly intelligent and quickly gets to grips with complex legal and factual points. He is thorough and thoughtful in the advice he provides, and his written work is to a high standard." (Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2024)
"Michael has x-ray vision for the key issues and leaves no stone unturned." (Chambers & Partners - Commercial Dispute Resolution 2023)
"Michael is a real team player, coupling strong analytical ability with an ability to argue complex points in a straightforward and persuasive way." (Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2023)
"Excellent team player. Great legal and strategic thinker." (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2023)
"A superstar in the making, he is technically brilliant, but he combines that with a very down-to-earth manner. He is excellent at explaining complex and difficult issues to clients, and takes a good, commercial approach." (Chambers & Partners - Commercial Dispute Resolution 2022)
"He is creative in his arguments." "You go to him for very technical points; he's super bright and really gets into the detail of the law." (Chambers & Partners - Commercial Dispute Resolution 2021)
“Has a labyrinthine brain and an astonishingly comprehensive grasp of the law, his written submissions are flawless and always turned around at lightning speed.” (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2022)
“A first-class brain, coupled with an extremely personable manner. He is capable of both performing creative in-depth legal analysis on novel points and providing a highly commercial perspective.” (Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2022)
"Technically brilliant with fantastic attention to detail, he is also an extremely pleasant person to work with." (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2021)
"An excellent junior - very hard working and well prepared, also very personable and friendly."(Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2021)
"He provides forensic analysis, clear advice and excellent drafting."(Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2020)
"An extraordinarily talented barrister." (Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2020)
"Has the kind of brain that can navigate complex financial instruments with ease." (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2019)
"An excellent academic lawyer and a very clear communicator with unusually good client skills."(Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2019)
“He has a very good brain and is extremely hardworking.” (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2018)
“Frighteningly clever, really hardworking and genuinely a lovely person.” (Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2018)
“The ideal addition to any banking litigation team.” (Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2017)
Academic Achievements

1995-1998 Jervis-Smith Scholar, Balliol College, Oxford
1996 Conroy Prize for Physics, Balliol College, Oxford
2000-2001 Jowett Senior Exhibitioner, Balliol College, Oxford
1999-2001 College Tutor in Physics, Balliol College, Oxford
2001-2003 Lecturer in Physics, St. Peter’s College, Oxford
2001-2003 Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship in the Department of Atomic and Laser Physics, University of Oxford, awarded by the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851
2002-2003 Fulford Junior Research Fellowship, Somerville College, Oxford
2003-2004 Lindemann Fellowship for Post-Doctoral Research at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), awarded by the English-Speaking Union
2004-2005 Science and Technology Fellow in Foreign Policy Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington DC
2005-2006 Lecturer in Science and Security, Department of War Studies, King’s College London
2006-2007 CPE Exhibition, Inner Temple
2007 City University / 7 King’s Bench Walk Essay Prize in Contract Law
2007-2008 BVC Major Scholarship, Inner Temple
Education

1994-1998 MPhys (First Class Honours), Balliol College, Oxford
1998-2002 DPhil in Atomic Physics (‘Quantum Chaos in Atom Optics’), Balliol College, Oxford
2006-2007 CPE (Distinction), City University
2007-2008 BVC (Outstanding), BPP Law School

Michael is very intelligent and able to deal with complex legal and factual issues with ease. His legal advice is clear and succinct and he has a good manner with clients.

Legal 500 - Commercial Litigation 2025

Michael is an excellent barrister. His advice is thorough and effective, and he is very client-friendly.

Legal 500 - Banking & Finance 2025

Michael is very cool under pressure. He demonstrates strong knowledge of the law and is clear and authoritative in his advice.

Chambers & Partners - Commercial Dispute Resolution 2025

Scope of Practice

Arbitration
Banking and Financial Services
Civil Fraud and Investigations
Company and Insolvency
Energy and Natural Resources
Injunctions
Jurisdiction and Conflict of Laws

Adam Wheeler

Jordan Foley

Max Tonkinson

My Portfolio

Michael d'Arcy

Barrister

Call 2008

Examples of Recent Cases

Arbitration

Banking and Financial Services

Commercial Litigation

Company and Insolvency

Jurisdiction and Conflict of Laws

Energy and Natural Resources

Injunctions

What the Directories Say

Academic Achievements

Education

Latest

Landmark judgment in diesel emissions litigation

One Essex Court shortlisted for 22 awards at The Legal 500 Bar Awards 2026

24 members of One Essex Court featured in 8 of The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2025