Darren Burrows

Darren Burrows

Senior Clerk
+44 (0)20 7520 4611
Email Darren
View Profile

Jackie Ginty

Jackie Ginty

First Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0)20 7520 4608
Email Jackie
View Profile

Rob Smith

Rob Smith

Deputy Senior Clerk
+44 (0)20 7520 4612
Email Rob
View Profile

My Portfolio

My List is empty.

Company and Insolvency

Invest Bank: Important High Court judgment on freezing injunctions

In Invest Bank v El-Husseini [2023] EWHC 3350 (Comm), Mrs Justice Dias has considered a number of important...

Read More

ClientEarth’s challenge to FCA prospectus decision dismissed

Section 87A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 provides that the FCA ‘may not approve a...

Read More

Shareholder ‘representative claim’ struck out

The High Court has struck out a representative claim brought by Wirral Council on behalf of certain investors...

Read More

The wide range of practitioners involved in this sector at One Essex Court, marks it out from the other mainstream commercial sets.  Both at KC and junior levels, members have a highly technical understanding of work affected by the Companies Act and the Insolvency Act, as well as EC Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings and the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations.

Members have considerable experience in acting for administrators, auditors, accountants, bondholders and bond trustees, creditors, directors, liquidators and shareholders in relation to a wide range of company law claims, corporate insolvency work and corporate restructuring.

A significant amount of work undertaken by barristers at One Essex Court in recent time has its roots back in the global financial crisis of 2008, with a wide range of members engaged in relation to collapsed banking institutions and distressed fund management vehicles.  This has involved a variety of instructions including for the administrators of Lehman Brothers and Kaupthing Bank, as well as for creditors and bondholders.

Barristers at One Essex Court acted for the joint administrators of Lehman Brothers Limited (in admin.) in relation to the 'Waterfall' application, which dealt with the priority of claims in the administration of Lehman Brothers Europe International.  The Court of Appeal's decision can be viewed here

More recent work in related areas includes: BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA for Sequana and the former directors of its subsidiary company in this landmark case in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court’s judgment is likely to become one of the leading company law authorities of this generation and considers a number of important questions of company law concerning the duties of directors; TAQA Bratani v FOGUK for the Claimants in these high-profile Commercial Court proceedings concerning the forfeiture of interests previously held by the Defendant in three oil and gas fields in the Brae complex and in a related claim under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986; for Deutsche Bank A.G. (London Branch) in its successful appeals in the priority dispute in Lehman Brothers Holdings PLC’s administration, and in resisting related appeals in the LB Holdings Intermediate 2 Ltd administration. The result is a comprehensive victory for Deutsche Bank and other holders of preferred securities (the “ECAPS”) issued by the Lehman Group, whose recovery depended on the outcome of both priority disputes.

Specialist counsel here also regularly advise on complex shareholder disputes and frequently appear in unfair prejudice claims brought under section 994 of the Companies Act.

Barristers here also acted in teams on both sides of the substantial shareholder claims brought in respect of the accounting irregularities uncovered at Tesco plc., and counsel at One Essex Court also acted for both the defendant bank and for institutional investors and shareholders bringing claims under sec. 90 FSMA, against The Royal Bank of Scotland and its former directors in relation to a £12bn rights issue - The RBS Rights Issue Litigation.

Several teams of counsel from One Essex Court were engaged for a number of Respondents in relation to an unfair prejudice petition brought by Mr Patrick McKillen in a dispute over the ownership of shares in the Maybourne Hotel Group.

Counsel from One Essex Court also represented Liverpool Football Club in the hotly contested ownership battle which involved the Royal Bank of Scotland, Kop Football Holdings and the then owners, Messrs Hicks and Gillett.

Webinars


One Essex Court Panel Webinar Series - Unfair Prejudice Petitions and Related Actions

In this panel webinar focused on Unfair Prejudice Petitions and Related Actions, Anthony de Garr Robinson...

View Webinar

The End of the No Reflective Loss Rule? The Supreme Court’s Decision in Sevilleja v Marex Financial Limited [2020] UKSC 31

In this webinar, Sophie Weber discusses the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Sevilleja v...

View Webinar